An Obligation to the Founders

The Framers of the Constitution were students of history. Most of them were lawyers, and they had studied the history of the law. They were establishing a republic and looked to history to guide them. The history of the Republic of Rome (449 B. C. to 131 B. C.) was given special attention.

The Roman Constitution, the Twelve Tables, had a fatal flaw. There was no way to amend it. In 131 B. C., when reformer Tiberius Gracchus became frustrated with his inability to change a society which was woefully in need of it, he, essentially, overturned the Constitution. If Gracchus could do it, anyone could. And soon did. And that was the end of the Roman Republic.

So the men who met in Philadelphia in 1787 were determined to allow for amendments to their Constitution. But they didn’t want to make it easy. Supermajorities, by their nature bipartisan, would be needed to amend. 2/3 of each House of Congress to propose, 3/4 of the states to ratify.

Since the first Congress proposed the Bill of Rights, we’ve had a couple technical amendments, (11 and 12) and then the great Civil War amendments, 13, 14, and 15.

The progressives at the turn of the 20th century, Republican and Democrat, brought us the income tax and direct election of senators, 16 and 17, (1913) and then the enfranchisement of women, 19 (1920). The only other truly significant amendments were 22 and 25, term limiting the President and providing for his removal if he is unable to perform his duties.

That’s it, the total for the last 230 years. They did good work, the Framers of the Constitution.

You will notice, if you look closely, that none of the reforms which have been adopted since 1791 have anything to do with Congress. That’s because Congress has no desire to place constitutional restrictions on itself. The first ten amendments, the Bill of Rights, do restrict Congress, but they were only agreed to because that was necessary to get the Constitution ratified.

The 17th amendment was a reform of Congress, but it was only agreed to by Congress because 30 of the required 32 states had passed Article V Resolutions calling for a Convention of States to propose direct election of senators.

It goes without saying that over the last 233 years Congress has evolved in ways the Framers wouldn’t recognize. Today it is a corrupt and dysfunctional institution, desperately in need of reform

This can only be done when state legislators wake up, and realize they hold the power in their hands to fix Congress. The Framers gave it to them, in Article V. Because they have this power, they bear the responsibility. I would argue that to keep the oath that they all swore, “to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” they must take up the power given them in Article V, and use it.

I think it is their obligation.

The Art of the Deal

A few years before I was born, a very long time ago, we lost the Supreme Court. It had defied Franklin Roosevelt, and blocked parts of the New Deal, but its defiance didn’t last long. Roosevelt failed in his 1937 attempt to pack the court. That failure effectively put an end to his New Deal improvisations, but the Court got the message, and soon adapted itself to the new political reality. It would no longer stand in the way of the expansion of the federal government. For 80 years it stood by while the constitutional limits on federal power were ignored, even ridiculed. This all culminated when the Court, and Chief Justice Roberts, gave its blessing to Obamacare in 2012.

Then things began to change. Gorsuch replaced Scalia in 2017, but that left Roberts as the swing vote. What tipped the scales were Kavanaugh in 2018, and Barrett in 2020. These were Trump appointments, but the real credit goes to Leonard Leo, and the Federalist Society.

As a candidate in 2016 Trump was, at first, flippant about who he might put on the Court. He even suggested his sister might make a fine Supreme Court Justice. This attitude horrified conservatives. We remembered George W, Bush, and his ridiculous appointment of Harriet Miers, his Deputy Chief of Staff. She was forced to withdraw, but the lesson was learned. Presidents could make really stupid appointments.

Trump was impulsive, and capable of getting it into his head that someone like Judge Judy belonged on the court. We asked ourselves, what were the chances that he would appoint real constitutional conservatives? It all came to a head with the death of Justice Scalia.

Trump was smart enough to realize that there were a lot of traditional conservatives who were very reluctant to vote for him. When Leanard Leo and the Federalist Society offered him a deal, he took it. He agreed that he would only nominate candidates who had been vetted, and recommended, by the Federalist Society. Trump made that deal, and as a result a critical bloc of voters supported him. He kept his end, and we got three outstanding conservatives as a result.

The Federalist Society is dedicated to, of all things, federalism! When the time comes, and these Federalist Society Justices are asked to rule on the epitome of federalism – Article V – we can hope they will be sympathetic.