DeSantis for President

I’ve been working for Article V, off and on, since 1983. That’s when the Alaska Legislature passed a Resolution calling for a Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA), using Article V.  I was serving in the Alaska Senate. At the time the national debt was $1.8 trillion.

From 2013 to 2018 the campaign for fiscal reform, using Article V, was my sole preoccupation. My sons Darren and Brendan and I co-founded the Reagan Project to promote it. I gave it everything I had.

But I basically gave it up, because left wing dark money (Soros, et al) had entered the game in Montana in 2015. There was no money to oppose them, and no national figure of stature to take the lead in the campaign. We were dead in the water.

But now, things have changed. The debt has increased twenty-fold, to $37.85 trillion. And Congress remains unwilling to restrain its deficit spending. In 2025 the debt increased $2.23 trillion.

Most importantly, our movement now has Florida Governor Ron DeSantis as its leader. He was in Idaho a few days ago, imploring its state legislators to pass the same bill I voted for 43 years ago.

There are different ways of counting how many states have passed resolutions calling for an Article V BBA. 34 are needed. There may be litigation soon to argue that that threshold has already been crossed. But the outcome of such a lawsuit is uncertain, and the safest way to proceed is to put the current count at 27 and run a campaign to get seven more state legislatures to act.

Believe me, this won’t be easy. In addition to the left-wing dark money problem, the ultra-far right John Birch Society is adamantly opposed, claiming to fear the boogeyman of a runaway convention. They are a real force in states like Idaho and Montana. Getting to an undisputed 34 states will take several years, at a minimum.

At the end of this year, Gov. DeSantis will be term limited out of his job. What better way to spend his time than by traveling the country, promoting a BBA using Article V? If the American people were made aware that there is a way to force Congress to stop spending this country into bankruptcy, they would demand that their state legislators take action and pass the needed resolutions.

The best way for DeSantis to promote Article V is by running for President. He’d have the bully pulpit and could use it to inform the voters that there really is a way to deal with the debt, and with deficit spending.

He wouldn’t be running against Vance, or Rubio, or Newsom or any Democrat. He’d be running against Congress. The American people, of all political persuasions, are well aware of the dismal state of the United States Congress. In a bipartisan manner, it is dysfunctional, corrupt, and incapable of reforming itself.

The Framers of the Constitution, George Mason in particular, foresaw the possibility of such a Congress, and gave the states a way to bypass it, and propose congressional reform amendments to the Constitution without congressional approval. This was the way the 17th Amendment, the direct election of United States Senators, came into being. At the time, 32 state Article V resolutions were needed for an Article V Amendment Convention. When the count reached 30, the Congress, in order to prevent such a convention from taking place, rolled over and proposed the 17th Amendment.

So, we may not need to get 34. If we get five more states, for a total of 32, Congress may propose an amendment itself. An actual Article V Convention would be avoided, and Congressional power would not be challenged.

Ron Desantis may or may not ever be elected to the Presidency. But if he can lead a successful Article V campaign, he will have made a more significant contribution to this country than a whole lot of Presidents have ever done.

Fritz Pettyjohn is working with the Federal Fiscal Sustainability Foundation to promote a lawsuit arguing that 34 states have passed Article V BBA Resolutions.

Mon 1/26/2026 5:54 PM

Why we have a Constitution

When the Revolutionary War was over, in 1783, the 13 states of America were in an economic depression. All of these states were deeply in debt from loans taken during the war, and their economies were frozen by a lack of credit. The Americans owned very little hard currency, and no country or creditor in Europe was willing to lend the additional sums the Americans would need to get their stagnant economy back on its feet.

Shay’s rebellion in 1786 was the last straw for George Washington. Those farmers in western Massachusetts were so desperate that they were willing to defy the law in order to avoid paying their lawful debts. It was an attack not just on credit, but upon private property itself.

Washington and all those who drafted and promoted the Constitution did so only because it was the only way that faith in the credit of the United States could be established. Once the new federal government, with ample tariff revenues at its disposal, agreed to assume all revolutionary War debts, foreign lenders would have enough confidence in our credit worthiness to extend new loans. Soon enough, the economy took off, and prosperity blossomed in the new country.

That’s why we have a constitution. It’s also why the Constitution needs to be amended, using Article V.

Great Men, Good Men

Most great men are not good men, at least when it comes to politicians. Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar and Napoleon were all great men, but none of them were good.

Washington and some other Founding Fathers were both good and great. Samuel Adams, Benjamin Franklin and James Madison come to mind. Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and Alexander Hamilton were great men, but not good ones. Andrew Jackson was a great man, but not a good one. The same for Franklin D. Roosevelt.

The best man in American history, the great man who saved the Union, was of course, Abraham Lincoln.

Donald Trump is on track to be a great man. I take no particular pleasure in saying that, because I don’t like Trump. I never have, and I never will. As men, we are almost complete opposites. He’s not my kind of guy, and I’m sure I’m not his kind of guy either. I don’t think he’s a good man.

But facts are facts, and even before he’s sworn in for his second term, I think he’s on the cusp of greatness. Taming Iran, pacifying the Ukraine, and achieving a world balance of power between the United States, Russia and China are all within his grasp. This isn’t happenstance. On the world stage, Trump knows what he’s doing.

Imagine a world in which all the great powers are at permanent peace with one another. A world in which disputes among the great powers are resolved without resort to the use of force. A world in which the great powers no longer threaten each other with nuclear weapons. This was Reagan’s dream, but it was unfulfilled.

Today it’s not just a dream. It could be a reality before Trump leaves office.

How, then, could you deny that Trump would properly be considered a great man?

How President Corleone Would Deal With Putin

People my age vividly remember Marlon Brando play “The Godfather.” It made a powerful impression on most people who saw it, including, no doubt, 26-year-old Donald Trump. It made such an impression on him that he, himself, decided to make himself into a Godfather, just like Marlon Brando in the movie. And he did.

So when you see the Don at Mar-a-Lago, think back to his inspiration, Don Vito Corleone.

In one of the iconic scenes in the movie, the Don receives those who wish to ask him a favor. It’s his daughter’s wedding day, and he is willing to make a gift of a favor granted. The supplicants are escorted in to see him and make their request.

I see Apple, and Amazon, and Google, and Facebook and Trudeau and all the other visitors to Mar-a-Lago, and I think back to the Don, on his daughter’s wedding day. Only Trump’s about to be inaugurated President.

As the Don said, “I asked God for a bike, but I know God doesn’t work that way. So I stole a bike and asked for forgiveness.”

And how would Trump’s inspiration, the Godfather, deal with Putin? Make him an offer he can’t refuse. As will Trump.

We Don’t Got to Show You No Stinking Badges!

Growing up in California you naturally are around a lot of Hispanics. When I was a kid we called them Mexicans.

I was raised by three devout Irish Catholic women from northern Minnesota, and even though Mexicans were also Catholic they didn’t like them. They really didn’t like any people they were unfamiliar with, especially blacks. The strange part was that they were sweet, lovely women, and prejudiced all to hell.

I got along OK with Mexicans, and blacks too, for that matter. They didn’t seem like a threat to me. When I was 15 a bunch of us white boys hitchhiked into the central valley to make a little money working in the fields, doing stoop labor. None of us lasted more than a couple of hours. Everyone in the fields doing the work was Mexican, except for one black guy. Those people are still doing all the work, 65 years later. The California economy is utterly dependent on them.

I still get along just fine with Hispanics, especially now since they’re changing how they vote. They are turning into my political allies. This totally screws the Democrats, in addition to all the other challenges they face.

The Hispanics I’ve gotten to know are mostly macho guys. They don’t like pansy-asses, and the bossy women who run the lives of pansy asses. They like this country and are damn glad it’s not like where they come from, whether it’s Mexico or somewhere else in Latin America. After a generation or two or three they turn into regular Americans.

This change in their voting behavior is accelerating. Having a preachy privileged black woman as their candidate hurt the Democrats with Hispanics. Hispanics, for the most part, don’t identify with blacks. They’re more comfortable around a white guy like Trump than a black woman like Harris.

What the hell is an Hispanic, or Latino anyway? Someone whose ancestors spoke Spanish, I guess. Race really doesn’t have anything to do with it. There are white Hispanics, black Hispanics, Native American Hispanics and everything in between.

In what meaningful way is Senator Ted Cruz any different from all the Senators with names like Murphy or Murkowski?

According to a genetic analysis by 23andMe I’m 99.7% white. Babbie is probably whiter than I am. My race used to be 90% of the USA. It will soon be a minority, if it’s not already. I don’t lose any sleep over it. I value my liberty, and that of my family, not my race. And my liberty is derived from my culture, not my skin color. And my culture is American red, white and blue.

If you accept this as your culture, you’re my brother, no matter where you came from, or what color your skin is.

Bienvenido, amigos!