An Obligation to the Founders

The Framers of the Constitution were students of history. Most of them were lawyers, and they had studied the history of the law. They were establishing a republic and looked to history to guide them. The history of the Republic of Rome (449 B. C. to 131 B. C.) was given special attention.

The Roman Constitution, the Twelve Tables, had a fatal flaw. There was no way to amend it. In 131 B. C., when reformer Tiberius Gracchus became frustrated with his inability to change a society which was woefully in need of it, he, essentially, overturned the Constitution. If Gracchus could do it, anyone could. And soon did. And that was the end of the Roman Republic.

So the men who met in Philadelphia in 1787 were determined to allow for amendments to their Constitution. But they didn’t want to make it easy. Supermajorities, by their nature bipartisan, would be needed to amend. 2/3 of each House of Congress to propose, 3/4 of the states to ratify.

Since the first Congress proposed the Bill of Rights, we’ve had a couple technical amendments, (11 and 12) and then the great Civil War amendments, 13, 14, and 15.

The progressives at the turn of the 20th century, Republican and Democrat, brought us the income tax and direct election of senators, 16 and 17, (1913) and then the enfranchisement of women, 19 (1920). The only other truly significant amendments were 22 and 25, term limiting the President and providing for his removal if he is unable to perform his duties.

That’s it, the total for the last 230 years. They did good work, the Framers of the Constitution.

You will notice, if you look closely, that none of the reforms which have been adopted since 1791 have anything to do with Congress. That’s because Congress has no desire to place constitutional restrictions on itself. The first ten amendments, the Bill of Rights, do restrict Congress, but they were only agreed to because that was necessary to get the Constitution ratified.

The 17th amendment was a reform of Congress, but it was only agreed to by Congress because 30 of the required 32 states had passed Article V Resolutions calling for a Convention of States to propose direct election of senators.

It goes without saying that over the last 233 years Congress has evolved in ways the Framers wouldn’t recognize. Today it is a corrupt and dysfunctional institution, desperately in need of reform

This can only be done when state legislators wake up, and realize they hold the power in their hands to fix Congress. The Framers gave it to them, in Article V. Because they have this power, they bear the responsibility. I would argue that to keep the oath that they all swore, “to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” they must take up the power given them in Article V, and use it.

I think it is their obligation.

Is Vance the Presumptive Republican Nominee in 2028?

Not necessarily. The process doesn’t even start until three years from now.

One thing seems certain: There is going to be a great deal of change in this country and around the world in the next year, much less three years. Most of it will be good, I think. Trump seems to know what he’s doing this time, and his most dangerous opponents are on their heels, whether it’s Russia, Iran, or the media-academic axis. No Russia hoax to distract him. and a band of talented loyalists around to do his bidding. Things look good.

So it’s easy to assume Trump will anoint Vance as his designated successor, and hand him the nomination. But that’s an assumption, and as a wise old pol told me, “Assumption begins with ass.”

Vance’s own political skills, based on the record, aren’t particularly impressive. He won in Ohio in 2022 in a relatively close election, with 53% of the vote. The rest of the 2022 Republican ticket did a lot better.

I like Vance, and admire him, and think he’ll do a fine job. But it’s way too soon to think he’s got the nomination in the bag. Let’s see him earn it.

Talk about change! Syria has been a country for over 100 years, and now it’s disappearing before our eyes. Israel has now completely freed itself of the hostile powers surrounding it: Hamas, Hezbollah and Syria.

Maybe there will be peace in the Holy Land this Christmas. Now that’s change I can live with. Now if we can get peace in Ukraine, we can really celebrate. The natural order of the world, with Russia and China and the United States as the three hegemons, is forming. And there is no reason in the world that these three peoples would want to fight each other.

Merry Christmas indeed!

Don’t Just Drain it. Eliminate it.

It doesn’t do much good to drain a swamp if it just fills back up again. So, everything Trump and the Republicans do to fix the mess in Washington can be undone by a new administration. The problems are structural, and to fix them for good you need amendments to the Constitution.

That’s where Article V comes in. Trump and the Republican Congress have no role to play in that process. That’s up to both Republican and Democrat state legislators.

Trump and Congrerss just have to get out of the way. That’s exactly what the Framers had in mind when they wrote Article V.

How Presidents Trump and Xi get Along

Jaw, jaw, jaw is better than war, war, war, and Trump has no desire to go to war with China, or anyone else for that matter. Taiwan’s de facto independence will be maintained, but we can still get along with the ChiComs. We just need to reach an accommodation that we both can live with. Nixon did it and so can Trump.

Trump has been belligerently aggressive with Canada and Mexico on tariffs, but not really with China. China is too big and proud to be bullied. He wants to cut a deal, but he knows better than to try and back President Xi in a corner.

A little personal diplomacy helps make the medicine go down, and here Trump has a great asset in his granddaughter, Arabella Kushner. Seven years ago, she serenaded President XI, singing to him in Mandarin. It was a huge hit. The Chinese people ate it up. I’ve little doubt that Xi would like to see her again. She’s grown into a beautiful young woman.

It all provides quite a contrast with Biden, who had his reprobate son try to shake the money tree in China, as well as Ukraine.

In world affairs, Trump’s next four years will be consequential for the rest of the 21st century. He will facilitate the end of the Ukraine war and bring peace to that war ravaged country. He will normalize relations with Russia, using carrots as well as sticks.

There’s no reason Russia can’t be a prosperous, peaceful country, part of the European family of nations. With American and European assistance, Russia’s enormous natural resource wealth can be fully developed, enriching the Russians and benefitting all mankind. Russia just needs to acknowledge that the post-Cold War international borders are inviolate.

India will be brought ever closer to the United States, and the developing nations of the world will be gradually integrated into the world economy. Prosperity won’t be achieved by beggar thy neighbor policies. Let the whole world prosper.

Trump has a lot of gas left in his tank, and he will exploit the opportunities for peace and prosperity with great energy for the next four years.

But the world is not our oyster, and the bad actors in it must be brought to heel. Military force will not be required, except in extraordinary circumstances. When it is needed, it will be brought with overwhelming force with a newly revamped and reenergized American armed forces. America and its allies can use our economic power to punish and reward in almost all circumstances.

But when Trump says, “There will be hell to pay,” the malefactors out there should pay attention.

The 21st century will be an American century, and President Donald J. Trump will be able to take a major share of credit. This will be fun to watch, and for those participating the most satisfying work of their lives.

The Question Kash Patel Needs to be Asked

I don’t know of anyone more devoted and loyal to Donald Trump than Kash Patel. With him at the FBI the President knows he has a man he can trust. As the head cop of the federal government, Patel will wield great power and need great discretion.

The FBI has a long and sorry record of improper political activism. Many of its violations of the civil liberties of American citizens were politically motivated. Is a man so feverishly loyal to the President capable of ever saying “No”?

If the President tasks him with surveilling his political opponents, with no legal justification, would Patel ever resist? If he cannot honestly agree to do so, he should not be confirmed.