The critical importance of the amendment power

Why didn’t they just fix the Articles of Confederation?  Why did they have to start from scratch?

Rhode Island.  This postage stamp sized state was so jealous of its sovereignty, (which, according to some of the Framers, allowed it to pursue pernicious ends) that it would agree to nothing.  Under the terms of the Articles, amendments must be unanimous among all thirteen states.  A fatal flaw.

The way Rhode Islanders saw it, that was not a bug, but a feature.  It gave them veto power over the other twelve states.  And they weren’t going to let go of it, for any reason.

Rhode Island prevented the Articles from being amended, and forced the other states to start over, with new rules for amendment, which would require supermajorities, but not unanimity.

This is why Rhode Island was the only state that didn’t even bother to send a delegation to Philadelphia.

The Constitution was drafted to deal with the Rhode Island problem, and this is why the provisions of Article V were so important.  And it’s why it’s so important to fix the technical defect of Article V: its failure to make clear that the states could meet with a simple quorum in order to consider an amendment.

The Framers understood all this.  Have we become so dim witted that we can’t?

We ain’t got to show you no stinking rules!

There are a couple of ways of controlling Congress.  One is to impose rules on them, the other is to take away their power.  The problem with imposing rules is what one of my political mentors, Sen. Bill Ray, Democrat of Juneau, used to call Rule 12.

He was the Senate Majority Leader my first year in Juneau, and I was the Senate Minority Whip.  I read the Rules of the Alaska Legislature, and made sure the majority was following them.  One day I caught them in a blatant violation, but Bill just shrugged it off.  He told me about Rule 12, the one that counted.  There were 20 members of the Senate, and twelve of them were in the Senate Majority.   That meant that Bill Ray, and the majority, decided on what the rules were.  The written rules were just guidelines.

The second way to control them is to take away their power.  Under the language of the Balanced Budget Amendment Resolutions which are active in 28 states, the term “balanced budget amendment” includes, within it, the possibility of a line item veto.  So I propose that the first substantive Article V Amendment should be the BBA, but only to the extent of a line item veto.

Democrats may not want to give President Trump, personally, this political weapon.  In which case the line item veto would be available to the next President, to be sworn in on January 20, 2021, and successors.  Trump would only get it if he’s reelected.

All Presidents want the line item veto.  90% of us come from states where the governor has it.  We all know it works.  It’s the best way to reign in legislative overspending.  It’s tried and true in the American political tradition.  It’s not a radical innovation.  We’ll all know what we’re getting.

It’s the sort of thing Article V is for.

September 15th, 1787

Everyone wanted to get out of Philadelphia, and today they might be able to finish their business.  But they had a lot of work to do. It was going to be a long day.

Historians and legal scholars have pored over Madison’s Notes of the Convention since they were finally made public after his death in 1836.  But to make them come alive, to really understand them, you have to have served in a legislature.  The last day of the session.  A ton of things to get done.   And everyone wants to go home.

This was what was on their calendar:

  1. The desirability of drafting an address to the people.
  2. The addition of Representatives, and electoral votes, to North Carolina, Rhode Island and Delaware.
  3. Amending Article I, Sec 10, dealing with the denial to the states of the power to impose duties on imports and exports.
  4. The rights of states to clear harbors and erect lighthouses.
  5. Presidential emoluments
  6. The Presidential pardoning power
  7. The Presidential appointment power.
  8. Technical amendments to Article II, Sec. 1
  9. Technical amendment to Article II, Sec. 2
  10. Technical amendment to Article III, Sec.2
  11. A substantive amendment to Article III, Sec. 2
  12. A technical amendment to Article IV, Sec. 2
  13. An attempt to amend Article IV, Sec, 2  Debated and defeated.
  14. A technical amendment to Article IV, Sec. 4
  15. Article V

After the long and contentious debate on Article V, with a number of proposed amendments, and a motion to delete the Article entirely, they passed it in what they thought was its proper form.  But it was, technically, incorrect.  But since this was the last day before engrossment, no further technical amendments would be introduced.

The day ended with a discussion of the navigation acts, and at the end, with speeches from John Randolph, George Mason, Thomas Pinckney and Elbridge Gerry.  Pinckney said he was inclined to vote no, “… but apprehending the danger of a general confusion, and an ultimate decision by the sword…”  he gave the plan his support.

Mason and Randolph of Virginia, and Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, all spoke to explain why they must vote no.  Mason’s words are remembered best.  He said he didn’t know if this government would end in a monarchy or a tyrranical aristocracy, but it would be one of the two.

I think Mason was right.  Because if Congress isn’t a tyrranical aristocracy, what is?

“Support This Constitution” continued

I was ready to quit the Alaska Legislature in 1988.  I’d spent two years in the Senate Minority and four in the Minority in the House.  I was still in no position to challenge our corrupt senior Senator, Ted Stevens  Leaving my family in Anchorage for four months a year while I played politics in Juneau was too much to ask of my wife.  The boys were thirteen, twelve and nine and I needed to be a full time father and husband.

But I thought the Republicans in the House might win enough seats in the ’88 election to allow us to form a bipartisan majority coalition with the Bush Caucus, which had six votes.  If so, as Republican Minority Leader, I had a chance to become Speaker, which would give me access to enough campaign cash to take Stevens on in the 1990 Republican primary.

It didn’t happen, and my last two years in Juneau were a waste of time.  I handed off my position as Minority Leader to my buddy Robin Taylor of Wrangell, and planned on finishing my novel.  Robin and I introduced HJR 54, calling for an Amendment Convention to propose a Term Limits Amendment.  I knew it was dead on introduction, but I wanted it on the record.

Then in November of 1989 the Berlin Wall came down, and my book was obsolete.  So much for my writing career.   I wrote a cut and paste job about the Pope, called “Triumph of Faith, Pope John Paul II and the Fall of Communism,” but no publisher was interested.

Back in Anchorage in 1991, the editorial page editor of the liberal Anchorage Daily News, Mike Carey, offered me a biweekly column in their Sunday edition.  This was a way to keep my name identification up, and also become the most prominent conservative voice in Alaska media.

I hadn’t given up on the Senate.  If I couldn’t take out Stevens, there was my “friend” Frank Murkowski’s seat.  Frank told me he really wanted to run for Governor, and that meant a vacant Senate seat.  In 1993 or so the owner of KENI radio, Tom Tierney called and offered me a two hour slot weekday afternoons.  KENI had Rush Limbaugh’s show, and was the first real talk radio station in Alaska.  It covered all South Central Alaska, with over 60% of Alaska voters in its audience.  To me this meant more name ID, and a greater voice in Alaska politics.  I was still politically viable.

In 1995 the Supreme Court ruled in U. S. Term Limits v. Thornton that states were not allowed to term limit their own Congressional delegation.  The people at U. S. Term Limits had made a mistake.  They should have tried to use Article V.  But now the term limits movement, and all Article V efforts, were dead in the water.  Maybe some day down the road, I thought.

My friend and banker David Cuddy took Stevens on the 1996 primary, and I was all in.  We planned to announce his candidacy on my radio show, and then I got a call from the station owner.  A lawyer for Ted Stevens told him that they needed to get me to back off, or Stevens would cause them problems with their license renewal with the FCC.  I had to cancel the Cuddy announcement or lose my show.  I should have quit in protest, but I wanted to keep my platform, so I stayed on.

In 1998 I got a call from the Daily News, advising me that my column was being cancelled.  No explanation.  A few years later Mike Carey invited me to lunch, and explained what happened.  Stevens was in their office for an interview with the editorial board, and the publisher asked him if there was anything they could do for him.  Cancel Pettyjohn’s column, he said, so that’s what they did.

Also in 1998 Murkowski’s daughter, Lisa, won a seat in the Alaska House.  I knew Lisa pretty well from her dad’s 1980 campaign, and I couldn’t see why she wanted to run for the state legislature.  She was a young wife and mother, who didn’t really have what it takes to be a politician.

The mystery was solved, in my mind, in 2000 when she ran for reelection.  To me, this meant one thing.  Her dad would be running for Governor in 2002, and if he won he’d appoint her to serve the last two years of his term.  I could stick around until 2004 and challenge her in the primary, but that might be hard to do.  She’d have all the money in the world, the support of her father the Governor, Ted Stevens, and Rep. Don Young.  She’d be a lousy candidate, and way too liberal for Alaska, but that was too steep a hill to climb.

So Babbie and I returned to California in the spring of 2001, after 27 years in Alaska.  Our three boys were in the lower 48, and the stock market boom of the 90’s had given us enough money to retire on.  Babbie wanted to be back in California with her family and friends.  My political career was over.

I’d challenged the corrupt Hickel-Stevens political machine, and they beat me.  I was a political failure.  At the age of 56, I didn’t know what to do with my life.  California politics was hopeless for a conservative Republican, and I had no connections in Washington D.C.  I started watching a lot of baseball.

I remained a keen observer of American politics.  I was disappointed, but not surprised, when Obama won in 2008.  The folly of the Iraq War cost the Republicans the Presidency.  That was easy to understand.  But I was stunned when he was reelected in 2012.  That shouldn’t have happened.

Was it a Democratic advantage in social media?  Or had demographics and governmental dependency given the Democrats an unbeatable, and growing, majority?  Obamacare would go into full effect in 2013, and a whole new federal entitlement would make the American people even more dependent on Washington.  I was extremely depressed.  Everything I believed in was in jeopardy.  It looked like we’d lose the Supreme Court.  And that meant losing the Constitution.  I was as low as I’d ever been in my life.

Then, in October of 2013, everything changed.   The introduction of Obamacare was a policy screw up and a political debacle.  Obama, and every Democrat in Washington, had repeatedly lied to the American people in order to sell the bill.  Those lies were political poison.  American politics had taken a decisive shift to the right.  The American people were turning against Washington.

This meant the Republicans were going to win the Senate in 2014, and the Presidency in 2016.  And even more was possible.  Article V was possible.  The wave was going to be that big.  My son Darren set up this website and blog, and with the Reagan Project I was back at what I loved, politics.

My search for an Article V movement led me back to Lew Uhler and the Balanced Budget Amendment.  In 1983 Alaska had been the BBA’s 32nd state, but since then there had been sixteen rescissions.  Still, with sixteen in the bank, we only needed 18 more.  It could be done.

I went to the December, 2013 meeting of the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council in Washington to meet the leaders of the Balanced Budget Amendment Task Force, Dave Biddulph and Bill Fruth, a couple businessmen from Florida.  I also met Mike Farris and Mark Meckler of the Convention of States, and a number of legislators, including Sen. Bill Cowsert of Georgia, Rep. Gary Banz of Oklahoma, Rep. Joe Harrison of Louisiana, Sen. Al Melvin of Arizona, Rep. Chris Kapenga of Wisconsin, Rep. Ken Ivory of Utah, Rep. Yvette Herrell of New Mexico, and Sen. Kevin Lundberg of Colorado.

The BBA Task Force sent me to Utah early in 2014 to help their sponsor, Rep. Kraig Powell.  Lew Uhler’s NTLC picked up the tab.  I was only in Salt Lake for a couple days, but I learned a lot.  In places like Utah our opposition was the John Birch Society and Phyllis Schlafly’s Eagle Forum.  They were peddling the runaway convention story.  It was a ridiculous argument, but they were politically strong enough to intimidate some Republicans into voting no.

And, more importantly, we’d get no help from the Democrats.  The BBA had turned into a partisan proposal.   Even though polling showed that 65% of Democratic voters favored a BBA, Democratic legislators were a different story.  There were no blue dog Democrats left, and the Democratic Party was now the party of, by, and for the government.

This had enormous implications.  It meant that no state legislative chamber controlled by Democrats, House or Senate, would ever pass a BBA Resolution.  It also meant that two of our existing sixteen Resolutions from the 1970’s — in Delaware and Maryland —  were in jeopardy.  The Democrats were in control, and could rescind their old BBA Resolutions at any time.

This meant the Task Force was one state short of Republican target states, in order for us to get to 34.  Unless Republicans picked up control of another legislature in the 2014 elections, we weren’t going to make it.

I wasn’t worried.  I was counting on Kentucky.  The Kentucky House was the last Democratically controlled chamber in the south.  It was trending Republican, and their Democrat Speaker, Greg Stumbo, looked weak, politically.

I was surprised and disappointed when the Democrats kept the House in November of 2014.  But I was shocked, and elated, that the West Virginia Senate had flipped, and Republicans had full control of the West Virginia legislature for the first time in 83 years.  State Senator Bill Cole, a car dealer from Bluefield,  had performed a political miracle, masterminding a massive shift in the Senate.  The political shock wave of the Obamacare fiasco was still running strong.  The BBA still had a shot at 34 states, with no Democrats needed.

In 2015 Bill Fruth and I went to Helena to work with our Montana sponsor, Rep. Matthew Monforton of Bozeman.  With some money from Lew Uhler’s National Tax Limitation Committee, I’d sent letters to every Republican legislative candidate before the 2014 election.   I explained Article V and the BBA, and asked for support.  Matthew was the only response I got in Montana, and he was prepared to fight for our Resolution.

The Birchers are stronger in Montana than any state in the union, and we didn’t have the votes to get out of committee in the House.  Then I met Ryan Clayton, who was in Helena to lobby for passage of the Wolf-pac Resolution, which called for an Amendment Convention on campaign finance reform.  We decided to help each other out.

Ryan would get the Democrat votes we needed to get out of committee, and I’d lobby the Republican Speaker, Austin Knudsen, asking that the Wolf-pac Resolution be allowed a floor vote.

Ryan convinced Rep. Ellie Hill to help us out in committee, and she did, bringing two other Democrats with her.  Now we had a tough floor vote ahead.  Monforton identified 10 Democrats who would vote with us, so we had a decent chance.

These Democrats, like Ellie Hill, believed in Article V, and knew the talk of a runaway convention was a red herring.  They just wanted to use it for a different purpose  —  campaign finance reform.  Like the BBA, campaign finance reform has overwhelming, bipartisan support with the voters.  But Congress would never do it.  It has to be done with Article V.

Then Democratic Governor Steve Bullock told the Democrats to back off.  He had been contacted by the Center for American Progress, a George Soros outfit, and asked to stop us.  All the Democrats abandoned us, and it was game over.

So it was in Montana that Bill Fruth and I realized Soros, with all his money and front groups, was on to us.  For years he had invested heavily in supporting Democrats in state legislatures across the country, and his price was killing the BBA, or any other Article V Resolution.  It was getting tougher to see how we could win.

Delaware rescinded its BBA Resolution in 2015, and New Mexico and Nevada had been retaken by the Democrats.  In 2017 Maryland, New Mexico and Nevada all rescinded.  The BBA Task Force had been able to pass its Resolution in sixteen states, which would have given it 32, only two short.  But with these rescissions we were barely alive with 28 states.  Only the surprise 2016 Republican win in the Minnesota Senate, giving us one more target state, kept us mathematically alive.

To get to 34, the Task Force needed wins in Montana, Idaho, Virginia, South Carolina, Minnesota and Kentucky  —  all tough nuts to crack, although Kentucky looked easy enough.  The Republican State Senate, at the urging of Sen. Rand Paul, had passed a BBA Resolution in 2013, and we had strong support in the House.  There aren’t a lot of Birchers in Kentucky, so it looked like smooth sailing.  Then Senator Mitch McConnell told the legislative leadership to kill the Resolution.  He didn’t want a Balanced Budget Amendment, and he didn’t like Article V  —-   for obvious reasons.

Article V is how you drain the swamp, and Mitch McConnell gets along fine in the swamp just as it is.  He’s the king of the swamp.  He hates Article V.  All creatures of the swamp hate Article V.  It’s up to the people, acting through their state legislators, to drain that swamp.  Article V is the constitutional procedure the Framers gave us for this precise reason.  At least, they thought they did.

Wolf-pac has five states.  The Convention of States, with its call for an essentially open amendment convention, has thirteen states, and small prospects for many more.  The BBA Task Force currently has 28 states, and if the Colorado Senate flips Democratic in November, as it’s very likely to do, they’ll be down to 27, at most.   Nobody can get to 34.

The states have never been able to call for an amendment convention, much less get the 2/3 vote needed to propose an amendment.  The most critical feature of our Constitution, the amendment power, doesn’t work as intended, and Congress is free to run amok.

To fix Article V we don’t need citizen’s groups like Wolf-pac, the Convention of States, or the BBA Task Force.  We don’t need an organization at all.  We don’t need money, and we don’t need publicity.  All we need is a critical mass of state legislators, Democrat and Republican, who unite on an ad hoc basis to amend Article V.

“Support the Constitution” is addressed to all 7,383 state legislators in the country, and all former legislators.  We all swore the same oath.  Let’s just do our duty.  Let’s do what the Framers called on us to do.

Webster’s defines “support” as:  “To hold up or in position; to bear the weight or stress of; to keep from sinking or falling; to uphold by aid or countenance; to take the side of; to verify or substantiate; to maintain; to comfort or strengthen.”

With respect to the Constitution, and Article V, it means “fix.”  Let’s just do it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“Support This Constitution”

In 1985 Babbie and I were vacationing in Hawaii with our three boys.  We’d been going over every year since 1976.  She was complaining about not having enough to spend on something, and asked me, “If you’re so damn smart,  how come we don’t  have any money?”

I was making about $46,000 in legislative salary, but my law practice income was down to about $25,000.  I wasn’t interested in practicing law.  I liked politics.

So I told her I could write a book, and make money as an author of fiction.  Once I told her that, I had to go through with it and write the book.  It was a Cold War thriller, with the hero a part Native Republican U. S. Senator named Herman Merculieff, from Kodiak.  I called it “Brinkman” and sent it around to some literary agents in New York.  One of them wrote back, and we got on the phone.

His name was Jay Garon, and he said he really liked the book, and thought he could sell it to a publisher.  He said I reminded him of another former state legislator he was working with named John Grisham, from Mississippi.  Jay assigned an editor to help me polish it up, and it looked like I was going to get published.

Then the Berlin Wall came down, and the plot of Brinkman was totally obsolete.  The Lord did not intend for me to be a scribbler.

Nonetheless, since Easter Sunday this blog has become a book in progress.  My literary agent, Jay Garon, has been gone a long time, but there’s an agency  in New York that bears his name, and is his successor.  So I’ve sent an email describing what I’ve been writing about, and hope to get them interested.

I’d like the book, “Support This Constitution”, to be out before the end of the year.  That way it will be available to the legislators of the 50 states as they begin their 2019 sessions.

I thought of starting with this post, and continuing as follows:

When I decided I wanted to fight communism, I knew I would need to get involved in politics.  My first chance was the Presidential election of 1960.  I understood very little at this age, but I knew Nixon had based his career on anti-communism.  I knew about his kitchen debate with Kruschev in Moscow in 1959, so I was a Nixon man.

In the fall of 1960 I was a junior at St. Mary’s High School on Berkeley, and I had a regular column in the student newspaper.  I wrote a piece in support of Nixon, and challenged anyone to a debate.  This was a Christian Brothers school, with most of the students the descendants of Irish, Italian or other Catholic immigrants.  Everybody was excited about the first Roman Catholic President.  But no one came forward to debate me.

Then in late September I read that Kennedy was making a whistle stop campaign tour of northern California, with a stop in Pittsburgh, only ten miles from my house.  I hitchhiked over to the train station, and as his train pulled in I ran out on the tracks behind it, and when it stopped I was in the front row of the crowd waiting for Kennedy to speak.

When he came out on the little platform, he leaned down and shook hands with those of us in the front row.  I didn’t support Kennedy, and I’m sure I had a skeptical look on my face.  He did a little double take when he looked at me.  Then he gave me a big smile, and right then I thought he was the most handsome, and nicest, man I’d ever seen.

When I graduated from high school in 1962 I was offered a scholarship at St. Mary’s College, but wanted to go to Cal instead.  That was where all the liberals were, and I intended to major in Political Science, and debate them.

I was the first graduate of St. Mary’s High to be accepted in Cal’s Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps.  I would take the Marine option in my junior year, and upon graduation go to Officer’s Candidate School and earn a commission as a Second Lieutenant in the United States Marine Corps.  If there was to be a fight against communism, I wanted in on it.  My Uncle Fritz had fought the Nazis, and I’d fight the Commies.

The classes at Cal were a big disappointment, and I never got to debate anybody.  So I ordered a Goldwater sweatshirt and wore it to class, hoping to provoke someone.

One of my classes was Speech, which I mistakenly thought meant political speech, There were only about 35 students, so we had a chance to interact with the instructor.  He was a little weasel of a guy, a lawyer who thought he was cool because he represented pornographers.   He was full of himself, and was obviously trying to impress one of the students, a real knock out of a girl.

My Goldwater sweatshirt clearly annoyed him, and one day he started class by asking “What do we really know about politicians?  What do we know for sure?  For instance, what do we know for certain about Barry Goldwater?  Well, we do know that he’s the senior Senator from Arizona . . . ”   At that point I interrupted him, saying, “No, he’s actually the junior Senator.”  I wound up getting a D in that class, but it was worth it.

Two years later, in 1964, I was all in on Barry Goldwater.  I read his Conscience of a Conservative, and I agreed with all of it.  I knocked on doors, passing out literature, and when he beat Rockefeller in the California primary, and sealed the nomination, I was elated.  One of my fondest memories is watching Walter  Cronkite report the election results as they came in.  He was in shock.  He couldn’t believe it.

By 1964 I was also involved with the Cal Young Republican club, which was part of the Free Speech Movement.  Political speech was restricted on campus, and the small minority of conservatives joined the anti-war left in protest.  I met people like Jerry Rubin and Mario Savio, and found common cause with them.

We won our protest, and in the fall of 1965, when I was Chair of the Cal YR’s,  we were allowed to set up recruitment tables in Sproul Plaza.  I had a card table between the ones for the Spartacist League and the Students for a Democratic Society.

This was where most students entered campus, and I put a big sign in front of my table, which read  “Make love and war.  FUCK COMMUNISM.”  I didn’t get anyone to sign up, and no one ever said a word to me about my sign.  But I’d made my point.  Free speech, baby.

After college and six months of bumming around Europe I went to Alaska to meet my legendary Uncle Fritz.  I decided to forget California and become an Alaskan.  But there were no law schools in Alaska, so I returned to California, met and married my wife of 47 years, and spent three years at UCLA Law School.

When my wife and I returned to Alaska in 1974 I did so with the intention of running for the United States Senate.  Alaska had a small population, was thin on political talent, and it had two Senate seats.  My initial target was Democrat Mike Gravel, but I wasn’t ready to run in 1980, so I worked on the campaign of the Republican, Frank Murkowski.  When Frank won we now had two Republicans in the Senate, so my path was blocked unless one of them was somehow removed.

I was elected to the State Senate in 1982, and found out about Article V during my first session in 1983.  This was the way for me to have an open seat to run for:  use Article V to adopt term limits, forcing my enemy and rival, Ted Stevens from office.  And so began my 35 years in the Article V movement.

I no longer have any personal political ambitions.  But I’ve become convinced that the use, by the states, of Article V is the only way the people of this country can reign in a corrupt and bankrupt institution  —  the United States Congress.  We all despise it, and we all want to do something about it.  With an amended, and revived, Article V, we still have time.

Article VI requires that all state legislators “. . . shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation to support this Constitution.”  And that’s exactly what they are being called upon to do.